The voice interactions are well-defined, well-functioning, and no user ever would describe them as "stupid". However, is it not good to do multiple-choice questions like visual interaction honestly with voice interaction? Why visual interaction people never executive email list mention artificial intelligence, and voice interaction, people always confuse it with artificial intelligence? Let's look at the second concept: the dimension of information. The dimension of information executive email list Auditory information and visual information are completely different in physical properties.
Visual information is two-dimensional information in space and can be sustained in the dimension of time. Auditory information is the zero-dimensional information executive email list of space, and its existence can only flash in the dimension of time. Therefore, when presenting the boundary of interaction (that is, when providing the option of "multiple choice"), the visual interface can present any complex interface in time and space to complete complex and efficient operations; executive email list while the voice interface, its options are presented in the presented interface.
At the same time, it is also disappearing, and the options must be stored in the short-term memory of people. The human short-term memory capacity is very executive email list limited, only 7 simple information modules can be stored. Therefore, the complexity of the traditional voice interface is limited within the range of human short-term memory capacity. executive email list Such a small amount of information is destined to have an embarrassing status for this kind of borderline voice, and it can only be "small trouble".